Friday, April 17, 2009
We have a winner!
Congratulations to Jen Greffet for winning Blue Prints Photography's biggest giveaway ever! Thanks so much to everyone who entered! Be sure to check back to my blog often for news of other specials (I usually have them monthly). Now we can get crackin' on her photo shoot, as soon as it stops snowing....
Monday, April 13, 2009
Blue Prints Photography Biggest Giveaway Ever!
(This contest limited to Colorado residents only, unless you are willing to travel to Denver to claim your prize!)
For the first time ever, I am offering $200 worth of services and prizes to one lucky winner in the Denver/Colorado Springs area! The $200 credit will cover a 1-2 hour photo session and several prints, depending on which sizes you choose. All you have to do to enter is go to 30 Days and leave a comment on the post about the contest. If you would like a second entry, simply post about the contest on your own blog, including a link to the 30 Days blog and this blog (be sure to mention in your comment that you did so). For a third entry, just leave a comment under this post telling me which picture on this blog is your favorite. That's it! Good luck to everyone!
(Since I feel bad about everybody not being close enough to Denver to have a photo session, I will send a prize to a person who lives too far away if they win the contest. Or they can donate their $200 products and services credit to a friend who lives nearby).
For the first time ever, I am offering $200 worth of services and prizes to one lucky winner in the Denver/Colorado Springs area! The $200 credit will cover a 1-2 hour photo session and several prints, depending on which sizes you choose. All you have to do to enter is go to 30 Days and leave a comment on the post about the contest. If you would like a second entry, simply post about the contest on your own blog, including a link to the 30 Days blog and this blog (be sure to mention in your comment that you did so). For a third entry, just leave a comment under this post telling me which picture on this blog is your favorite. That's it! Good luck to everyone!
(Since I feel bad about everybody not being close enough to Denver to have a photo session, I will send a prize to a person who lives too far away if they win the contest. Or they can donate their $200 products and services credit to a friend who lives nearby).
Friday, April 10, 2009
How to choose a great photographer
Pick me! Pick me! That's all you need to know.
O.K., seriously folks, I ran across the website of another photographer tonight, and I started thinking about how people pick someone to photograph their children and families. I realized that it may be difficult to separate the good photographers from the bad, and to be able to tell what really "good" photography is. You may have had a friend come to you, giving you glowing reports about a photographer and showing you the cute pictures of their smiling children. Cute smiling kids must equal a great photographer, right? Not necessarily. Please consider the following:
Most new photographers suffer from a terrible syndrome. It is called "I am so awesome that I can hardly believe I'm real." I admit that I suffered from this syndrome at one point. Even though I had seen photography from really, really great and famous photographers, I somehow could not see that my photography was woefully lacking compared to theirs. All I knew is that my friends said I was awesome, and that was good enough for me. Of course, this syndrome was also tempered by the "I'm so terrible I can't believe people would actually pay me money" syndrome. This is a good syndrome to have! It pushed me to learn and grow and increase my skills. Unfortunately, some photographers only have the first syndrome, and never the second. Here are the telltale signs:
1. They post all 247 pictures from a session on their website with no editing whatsoever. There are loads of blurry pictures, pictures of babies crawling out of the scene, and even pictures that are corrupted where most of the frame is green.
2. They do "selective color," and do it badly. Everybody loves the black and white pictures of the little girl where only the pink rose is in color. But watch out for abnormally-colored eyes and other wonky colors that look fake. It means they probably are. Selective color should be used sparingly and add to the feel of the picture. It shouldn't be done just because Photoshop makes it possible.
3. They charge too little for their sessions and prints. I once read a book about photography that gave the advice to avoid any photographer who charged less than $100 for a session. At the time, I charged less than $100, so I thought this was bad advice. Looking back, I can tell you that it is, in fact, very good advice. Good photography is an investment. If you only want to pay for cheap photography, you'll get cheap photography. I understand that not everybody can afford hundred-dollar sessions. In my mind, it's something worth saving up for. You want beautiful portraits that will stand the test of time and not be thrown in a drawer.
4. Good photography is all about the light. A tell-tale sign of an amateur photographer is little round pinpoints of white in the eyes of his subjects. This means he has used on-camera flash, which is a total mood-killer and makes the pictures look anything but professional. Good light should most often come from the side, and you should be able to see a catchlight in the eyes. It can be any shape and come from any direction (especially in natural-light situations) but it should never, never be right in the middle of the pupil! Good professional photographers can use flash and make it not look like flash, and it is used most often to enhance the light, not be the main light source. Many wedding photographers have to use flash because of the lighting situations they encounter, but they will diffuse it or bounce it, or do most anything not to aim it directly at their subjects.
Whew! I could go on and on. But the next time you are considering a photographer, really look at their pictures and evaluate them for more than just whether or not the subject is smiling. Choose wisely, my friends!
O.K., seriously folks, I ran across the website of another photographer tonight, and I started thinking about how people pick someone to photograph their children and families. I realized that it may be difficult to separate the good photographers from the bad, and to be able to tell what really "good" photography is. You may have had a friend come to you, giving you glowing reports about a photographer and showing you the cute pictures of their smiling children. Cute smiling kids must equal a great photographer, right? Not necessarily. Please consider the following:
Most new photographers suffer from a terrible syndrome. It is called "I am so awesome that I can hardly believe I'm real." I admit that I suffered from this syndrome at one point. Even though I had seen photography from really, really great and famous photographers, I somehow could not see that my photography was woefully lacking compared to theirs. All I knew is that my friends said I was awesome, and that was good enough for me. Of course, this syndrome was also tempered by the "I'm so terrible I can't believe people would actually pay me money" syndrome. This is a good syndrome to have! It pushed me to learn and grow and increase my skills. Unfortunately, some photographers only have the first syndrome, and never the second. Here are the telltale signs:
1. They post all 247 pictures from a session on their website with no editing whatsoever. There are loads of blurry pictures, pictures of babies crawling out of the scene, and even pictures that are corrupted where most of the frame is green.
2. They do "selective color," and do it badly. Everybody loves the black and white pictures of the little girl where only the pink rose is in color. But watch out for abnormally-colored eyes and other wonky colors that look fake. It means they probably are. Selective color should be used sparingly and add to the feel of the picture. It shouldn't be done just because Photoshop makes it possible.
3. They charge too little for their sessions and prints. I once read a book about photography that gave the advice to avoid any photographer who charged less than $100 for a session. At the time, I charged less than $100, so I thought this was bad advice. Looking back, I can tell you that it is, in fact, very good advice. Good photography is an investment. If you only want to pay for cheap photography, you'll get cheap photography. I understand that not everybody can afford hundred-dollar sessions. In my mind, it's something worth saving up for. You want beautiful portraits that will stand the test of time and not be thrown in a drawer.
4. Good photography is all about the light. A tell-tale sign of an amateur photographer is little round pinpoints of white in the eyes of his subjects. This means he has used on-camera flash, which is a total mood-killer and makes the pictures look anything but professional. Good light should most often come from the side, and you should be able to see a catchlight in the eyes. It can be any shape and come from any direction (especially in natural-light situations) but it should never, never be right in the middle of the pupil! Good professional photographers can use flash and make it not look like flash, and it is used most often to enhance the light, not be the main light source. Many wedding photographers have to use flash because of the lighting situations they encounter, but they will diffuse it or bounce it, or do most anything not to aim it directly at their subjects.
Whew! I could go on and on. But the next time you are considering a photographer, really look at their pictures and evaluate them for more than just whether or not the subject is smiling. Choose wisely, my friends!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
